Adjudication Method
Adjudication will be carried out by 6 persons selected from the PAGB Judges list. Each print and slide will be scored electronically (2 to 5) by each adjudicator but only the total score for each photograph will be announced.
Pictures will not be presented as panels but will be mixed and judged as individual images. Prints may be unmounted or mounted but not framed. The maximum size including mount is 50 x 40 cm. Mounts to be lightweight of a type that will not damage other prints when stacked. Velcro or any similar material must not be on either side of prints. The title may be on the front of the print but not the applicant's name.
Slide mounts should normally be 5 x 5 cm, Super slides are acceptable. Larger formats suitable for projection will be accepted if there is sufficient demand, Mixed Print and Slide entries are not permitted.
Prints & Slides for use at future Adjudications
All successful applicants will be requested to loan a print or slide that scored in the passing range. These will be used prior to the appropriate level at future adjudications to show the standard of entry in the passing range. Prints will be returned on request after one year, enabling them to be used for two adjudications; slides will be copied by the PAGB & the original returned as soon as possible
Audio Visual
Adjudication will be carried out by 3 persons selected from the PAGB AV Judges List and each applicant's sequences will be shown consecutively then scored as a whole by each adjudicator marking 2 to 5. Only the total score will be announced.
The applicant's name/s must not appear anywhere in the production, (See the guidance notes for Joint Applications)
Guidance Notes for Joint AV Applications
Joint applications are permitted in AV and ideally both partners would contribute equally to all aspects of the programmes submitted. This seldom happens, applicants must decide whether this is so far from the ideal that in reality one partner is acting as an assistant to the other rather than working jointly.
Applications will still be considered to be joint where:
| 1. | One partner does more work than the other. The absolute limit would be two thirds/one third but the Adjudication panel would view such a large proportion with disfavour. An application cannot be considered to be joint where one partner is clearly dominant. | |
| 2. | The roles of the two partners are more clearly defined. No general rules can be laid down but examples include: | |
| a) Conception worked out jointly, one partner takes all the photographs, the other writes the script and both are involved in the sound recording and presentation. b) Conception by one partner, both take the photographs, one partner does the recording, the other the script and both work on the presentation. |
The adjudication will require details of all these matters. Applicants should remember that it is generally harder to gain an award jointly than individually; for a joint application both partners pay the full entry fee.